|
2007
When expenses go wrong
NOVEMBER 2007: In the moral maze that is the
modern office, it seems the expense claim is still something of a grey area.
Travelodge surveyed 4000 employees and found that 22% of workers admitted to
regularly fiddling their company expense claims, which would mean a
staggering 6.3 million Britons are on the take. All the survey was
relatively small, it still found claims for items as spurious as helicopter
re-sprays, pregnancy testing kits and a vet’s bill for neutering a cat. (Read
more...)
No work, great pay: an account manager siphons payroll distributions through
a delayed employee termination scheme
JUNE 2007: THE PAYROLL DEPARTMENT CAN BE AN
organization's biggest source of potential fraud. For Ashmont Cleaning Co.,
what started as a simple employee complaint regarding a missing vacation
check developed into the discovery of the largest payroll fraud in the
company's history. (Read
more...)
Fraud at the top:
a prominent executive, aided by several employees, embezzles US $500,000
over a 10-year period
APRIL 2007: AFTER 27 YEARS OF EMPLOYMENT WITH Scout's, a large retailer, Tom
Carter had risen through the ranks to vice chairman--the second
highest position in the company--and was also a board member. He
was a protege of the company's late founder. Carter had witnessed
firsthand the massive growth of the company. His vast experience
and long tenure made him a larger-than-life figure within the
organization.
During his final year of employment, Carter's salary was more
than US $3 million. He also owned US $20 million in company stock,
plus options, and was eligible for a substantial retirement income.
His impressive career at Scout's ended when he retired as vice
chairman and was forced to resign from the board after he was
accused of embezzling US $500,000. (Read
more...)
Fraud in the
audit department: a CAE looks to restore his team's credibility after a
member of the staff is caught embezzling company funds
APRIL 2007: BILL IS THE CHIEF AUDIT EXECUTIVE (CAE) for Namnetics, a
publicly traded medical supply company in central California with
annual revenues approaching US $1.5 billion. The company has
manufacturing and distribution facilities in five U.S. states and
in Mexico. Namnetics' audit department consists of Bill, two
managers, and eight staff auditors.
One of Bill's worst nightmares has just come true: A member of
his audit team has just been arrested for fraud and embezzlement.
The suspect, Cheryl, is internal auditing's most senior manager and
has been with the department for nine years. Before moving to
auditing, she was a supervisor in accounts payable (AP). (Read
more...)
2006
Lapping up the profits: deficient controls enable an accounting director to
fleece approximately US $350,000
DECEMBER 2006: STEFAN WINKLER HAD WORKED FOR
Mogel's Inc., a beverage company in Florida, for nearly two decades. As
controller and director of accounting, Winkler touched the money that came
into and out of the company at every stage, though he was particularly
focused on the incoming money.
Mogel's collected money from customers in two
ways: either the delivery drivers brought in cash or checks from the
customers on their route, or credit customers sent their checks by mail. The
cash and checks from drivers were counted and put in the bank as route
deposits; the checks arriving by mail from credit customers were filed as
office deposits. Drivers gave their daily collections to a cashier who
filled out the route deposit slip and sent it to Winkler.
Any checks from
office mail came directly to Winkler, who verified that the money was
received according to the customer's payment schedule--30 days for some
customers, 60 for others, and so on. Part of Winkler's job was to combine
office and route deposits for the final accounting before a bank deposit was
made. Theoretically, Mogel's had two revenue streams, both of which
converged at Winkler's desk and poured smoothly into the bank. (Read
more...)
The patient
embezzler: nonexistent segregation of duties and unlimited access to cash
entice a long-time employee to raid the company's coffers
OCTOBER 2006: NINA, A CASHIER AT AN INDONESIAN automotive dealership, handled
the cash management system at one of the dealership's branch
offices. The system recognized and differentiated between two types
of cash flows--bank transactions and cash transactions--and was set
up to receive credit card payments that were recorded as bank
transactions. When a customer paid with a credit card, the bank
charged the company a merchant fee for the transaction. This fee
averaged about 3 percent of the total payment and was deducted
directly from the amount of the payment deposited; thus, only the
net amount of the deposit appeared on the bank statement. (Read
more...)
Are Your Staffers Stealing?
OCTOBER 2006: Alan Bridges never
thought it would happen to him. But since he founded Allpoints Equipment in
Tampa in 1992, he's been robbed on almost 50 occasions--by his own
employees. One staffer in accounting paid part of Allpoints' utility bills
each month, then set aside a few hundred bucks to cover her home electric
bill. A top finance executive included his family vehicles on Allpoints'
auto insurance plan. And another worker stole $24,000 worth of tools,
equipment, and scrap metal from a job site; he was caught hawking some items
at a pawnshop. (Read
more...)
Personal Purchase Fraud
OCTOBER 2006: According to a 2004
commentary by ABC News’ John Stossel, the General Accounting Office reported
that government employees had used government credit cards to purchase
computers, digital cameras, women’s lingerie, jewellery, engagement rings,
Elvis photos from Graceland, and escort services in New Jersey.
Another government employee used
government funds to buy his girl friend breast implants.
Personal purchases fraud occurs when
the fraudster purchases goods or services for personal use and then tricks
his/her employer into paying for them. (Read
more...)
Fraudulent
overtime: access to the company's time recording system enables a local site
manager to commit fraud
JUNE - 2006: JAMES BELL, THE
AUDIT MANAGER AT Ashmont Cleaning Co., received a tip from the finance
department regarding procedural breakdowns in accounts payable at one of the
company's job sites. Although he did not identify any specific indications
of fraud, there was enough anecdotal evidence to warrant a trip to the
customer's Georgia manufacturing plant to investigate. Under the guise of a
standard operational audit, the audit manager arranged a three-day review of
back-office functions at the plant. (Read
more...)
Ghost Employees
When fraud emanates from the top of the
organization, it usually spreads throughout the organization like a cancer.
Once the lower ranks discover that those above them are perpetrating fraud,
many of them decide to perpetrate their own schemes as well.
For example, while AIC while top management
was busy bilking unsuspecting inventors out of millions, Lisa Boulerice was
busy duping AIC out of over $235,000 in fraudulent disbursements.
Lisa Boulerice’s fraud scheme is called a
ghost employee scheme. (Read
more...)
When the Boss
Trumps Internal Controls
FEBRUARY 2006: What a difference a hotline, a routine audit and the right reporting chain
could have made.
When a college was so broke it couldn’t even afford copy
paper, toner and other inexpensive supplies, it took some sleuthing to find
the reason. This article summarizes the heroic efforts of one CPA, without
pay or outside staff (or experience in fraud detection), who helped bring
down a powerful and arrogant college president. (Read
more...)
Fictitious Vendor Schemes
In fictitious vendor schemes, the fraudster
establishes a ‘shell company’ that exists on paper only, but provides no
goods or services to the victim organization. The shell company periodically
submits invoices to the victim organization, which then pays for the
services or goods never received. (Read
more...)
2005
Audits That Keep Fraudsters Guessing
NOVEMBER 2005: Scratch the surface of many audit plans and
you’ll find predictable elements that someone bent on fraud can anticipate
and foil. That’s why SAS no. 99, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial
Statement Audit, requires auditors to incorporate elements of
unpredictability into their procedures. Here’s how. (Read
more...)
The troublesome teller: a bank employee takes advantage of numerous lapses
in controls to help herself to money from the vault
OCTOBER 2005: LAURA HAD BEEN WORKING as a bank
teller in Nashville, Tenn., for five years when she was transferred to a new
branch and promoted to head teller. As a teller, Laura wasn't making much
money, and her credit card bills were mounting. She owed about US $14,000.
With her new position and increased authority, Laura saw an opportunity to
wipe out her debt with one fraudulent act. (Read
more...)
On-Book vs. Off-Book Fraud
Schemes
OCTOBER 2005: For obvious reasons, cash is the
asset most often stolen by dishonest employees. Fraudsters will steal either
the incoming cash receipts or the outgoing cash disbursements via a variety
of fraud schemes. When conducting fraud investigations, one must first
understand the controls and procedures in place for processing cash flowing
through a business. If controls over incoming cash receipts are inadequate
and those incoming cash flows are substantial, then dishonest employees will
attempt to divert some of that cash flow into their own pockets. (Read
more...)
Focus on fraud:
internal controls, audit policies--and a tough stance--can help deter fraud.
SEPTEMBER 2005: Typically,
fraud occurs in the shadows. While a bank
robber steals with a gun in front of employees and customers, the person who
steals by committing fraud generally goes unseen.
Three conditions characterize
fraud: incentive or
pressure, opportunity and rationalization. Examples of incentive or pressure
include greed, living beyond one's means or personal financial losses.
Opportunity may be found in acts such as taping passwords to computer
monitors or leaving signed checks in unsecured areas. Rationalization is
demonstrated by attitudes or comments such as "they owe me" or "they have
more than enough money to spare." (Read
more...)
Drying out fraud:
an anonymous tip leads auditors to a former employee who used fictitious
contracts to steal from the company
AUGUST 2005: AN ANONYMOUS
LETTER WAS sent to the internal audit department of a natural gas public
utility company indicating that something "strange" was happening in the
sales department of the company's specialty division. In addition to
providing natural gas service, the organization had a separate division that
sold gas appliances under the name the Home Energy Center (HEC).
As a public
utility, most of the company's operations were subject to regulation by a
state utility commission. However, the HEC sales division operated as a
retail outlet and, as such, was a part of the unregulated segment of the
company. The letter indicated that appliances were being delivered out of
the warehouse using sales contracts that were described as "suspect." No
other details were provided. (Read
more...)
When You Suspect Fraud
JUNE 2005: The new general manager of a small manufacturing company
knew something was amiss. Each time he asked the chief financial officer for
critical cost information he got the runaround. “We don’t have a cost
accounting system that can produce that information,” the CFO would say. Or,
“I’m sure we have those data somewhere. Let me get back to you.” But he
never did. (Read
more...)
Advance to go, collect $800,000: a controller's embezzlement scheme almost
destroys an established manufacturing company
JUNE 2005: DAVE HAS OWNED A SMALL, successful
manufacturing company for more than 50 years. Until recently, business had
been booming, but current year sales had fallen dramatically, leaving the
company barely profitable. Cash flow had become a major problem, and the
company was borrowing from its line of credit almost weekly to keep
operations running smoothly. Because Dave was so focused on decreasing sales
and earnings he failed to consider the real reason his cash was
shrinking--embezzlement. (Read
more...)
A proactive approach to combating fraud: seven
pre-emptive
measures can help internal auditors deliver a first-round knockout to
fraudulent activity
APRIL 2005: INTERNAL AUDIT PROFESSIONALS SHOULD PLAY AN integral role in their
organization's fraud-fighting efforts. In fact, evidence shows that
organizations fare better in terms of fraud when internal auditors are
present. In its 2004 Report to the Nation, the Association of Certified
Fraud Examiners states that the median loss for organizations with an
internal audit department was $50,000 less than in organizations without an
audit department.
The report also indicates that fraud schemes were
identified by internal audits at more than twice the rate of external
audits, despite the fact that victim organizations in the study were more
likely to have external audits. (Read
more...)
Achilles’ Heel -
Management Override of Internal Controls a Weak Link in Fraud
Prevention
MARCH 2005: ControlCo.’s audit committee chair was stunned when the company’s counsel
informed him that the prior year’s revenue and earnings may have been
overstated.
“How could that happen?,” the audit committee chair asks. “We have good
internal controls and management, and the auditors both signed off that they
were effective.”
And that’s when it became apparent: those who design and implement
internal controls––management––also can override or bypass those controls.
Many financial statement frauds have been perpetrated by senior
management’s intentional override of what might otherwise appear to be
effective internal controls. (Read
more...)
Fraud:
deterrence and detection greed - a case study

MARCH 2005: Greed: Fraud can occur almost
anywhere in a company this case study highlights how one controller followed
his intuition to uncover a major fraud. (Listen
to audio)
Grounds for dismissal: a controls breakdown enables a coffee company's IT
manager to perpetrate a lucrative fraud
FEBRUARY 2005: MARY DOE BEGAN WORKING AT The
Coffee Co. in November 1999 as an application manager in the Information
Technology (IT) department. Her job responsibilities included managing and
implementing IT projects. She supervised approximately a dozen employees.
Within a few weeks of her hiring, Doe, on
behalf of The Coffee Co., signed a consulting services agreement with
Fictitious Consulting Company (FCC). To begin doing business with a vendor
such as FCC, Doe was required to obtain written approval of the contract
from a supervisor. Instead, Doe forged her supervisor's signature. (Read
more...)
2004
The Quarter-Million-Dollar Caper
NOVEMBER 2004: Let’s face it—conducting a routine audit of a good, stable
client can be boring and repetitive. Every year seems much like the last:
tracing and vouching, reconciling, ticking and footing, examining documents
and ledgers, evaluating controls. But despite the humdrum, good auditors are
always on the lookout for abnormalities. The following case study reveals
how alert auditors uncovered a fraud and, by behaving with professional
integrity, turned a potentially bad situation into a positive one. (Read
more...)
Anatomy Of A
Fraud
Most fraud victims clam up. In this check-tampering case,
the victim-a small-business owner-decided to speak out. The resulting
cautionary tale offers a rare, detailed look into the mechanics and
psychology of fraud. And its aftermath. Unfortunately, this time the
perpetrator wasn't the only one who wound up in court. (Read
more...)
Tips on Preventing
Employee Theft
SEPTEMBER
2004: The most
common employee theft: The one trusted person in a small
business takes high or extra pay checks, or writes checks to him or
her self, to "cash," to personal creditors, to an accomplice, or to
a bogus company creditor that is actually the trusted person.
These employees:
-
Have check signature authority or
-
Get blank checks signed by the owner
or
-
Forge the owner's signature on
checks or
-
Alter the check after the owner has
signed it (Read
more...)
The Case of the Pilfering
Purchasing Manager
MAY 2004: One way to deter dishonest employees: Make
vacations mandatory.
Chris, we have a problem,” said the voice
on the other end of the line. “Our purchasing manager, Bruce, is on vacation
and we think we have discovered some irregularities.” Chris Rosetti, CPA,
swung into action.
Rosetti—a partner with BST Advisors LLC in Albany, New
York—had done limited work for the client, a state agency, in the past. This
time, he quickly discovered the agency had two key internal control
deficiencies. The first was that Bruce hadn’t been forced to use his
vacation time in three years. Rosetti, a veteran adviser in at least 100
fraud cases, had seen this situation many times: Once employees start
committing fraud, they can’t take time off because they need to constantly
cover up what they’re doing.
The second deficiency was that Bruce was
allowed to approve new vendors. So, not only was he approving the purchases,
but he also was selecting the vendors—a serious breach of separation of
duties. When he was forced to take time off to attend to his sick wife, the
agency received requests for payment on three invoices for which there were
no vendor files. They were later located in Bruce’s desk. That’s when Rosetti was called in. (Read
more...)
Management left unchecked: a hole in a company's internal
controls enables a plant manager to institute a fraud scheme using customer
returns
APRIL 2004: BRAD THOMAS WAS THE AUDIT risk manager for Retail Inc., a large
multinational corporation. Monthly, he was responsible for reviewing
division financial statements and clearing abnormal variances. The review
was a manual process until four months ago when a new audit software program
was installed. Since then, Thomas, with assistance from division
controllers, has been able to explain all but one questionable variance. The
variance was from a plant and warehouse located a couple thousand miles from
corporate head-quarters. His analysis indicated that costs of sales,
particularly customer credit dollars, were very large and increasing.
To better understand what was happening, Thomas examined a
sample of processed credits and supporting documentation. It quickly became
apparent that receiving records supporting customer returns were not
prepared and that return goods authorizations were often prepared after
customer returns were received. Thomas reviewed this schedule with the
credit department manager. The manager reported that Greed had told
receiving employees they did not have time to prepare receiving records.
Also, receiving employees were instructed to accept customer returns without
an approved returned goods authorization as a customer accommodation and to
reduce freight expense. (Read
more...)
Employee
Dishonesty
National Survey of Risk Managers on Crime
During the last several years, corporations once held in high regard because
of their power and profit have been cited in headline news stories alleging
claims of dishonesty and corruption. Several corporate executives have been
indicted and prosecuted for fraudulently enticing investors and stealing
corporate assets.
This corporate dishonesty created havoc in the United States capital
markets, ultimately causing millions of individuals to lose trillions of
dollars. Faced with plummeting portfolios and tighter pocketbooks, have
employee opportunists taken advantage of their corporate position to steal
assets from the workplace? (Read
more...)
2003
Trouble in travel
DECEMBER 2003: AMANTHA, A UNIVERSITY auditor, was
assigned to review the travel records for the coaches and recruiters in the
school's athletic program. As Sam delved into the many files and papers
associated with her task, she found problems typical of most travel forms: a
lack of sufficient documentation for expenditures, the occasional use of
first class or luxury rental vehicles, and a few instances of disallowable
expenditures such as beer mixed in with a gas bill or a movie on a hotel
bill. There was really only one point she was going to make in her report,
so as she was preparing to wrap up, she decided to discuss the potential
finding with the athletic department's director. (Read
more...)
How An Honest Employee
Crossed the Line
NOVEMBER 2003: Fraud experts have told me that
most employee frauds are committed when one or more elements of the “Fraud
Triangle” apply to an individual. Those elements are financial
pressure…rationalization…and opportunity. In my case, all three were
present. I allowed myself to see embezzlement as a way out from a huge debt
burden that resulted from child support attachments (I owed my ex-husband
$20,000 in child support)…arrearages attached on my earnings by my
ex-husband and other factors. (Read
more...)
A Thief Within
MAY 2003: If Patty Preston hadn't
taken a vacation in March 2000, it might have taken her bosses some
time to realize that she'd been stealing from them. Preston was a
bookkeeper at Graff-Pinkert Inc., a family-run business in Oak
Forest, Ill. Owned by brothers Lloyd and Jim Graff, the company
buys and sells machines that make metal components. It was Jim, the
company's vice president and treasurer, who discovered that
something was amiss. (Read
more...)
Beyond the obvious: often, those who commit one fraud have no qualms about
continuing the practice.
APRIL 2003: Further investigation into the inner workings
of one insurance company leads to a compendium of wrongdoing
THURSDAY, 2:00 P.M., XYZ INSURANCE. Audit Manager Lou Wilcox and
Senior Auditor Randy Starr are called to the office of Larry Gabor,
vice president of Group Insurance Operations at XYZ Insurance
Company.
"We have a problem," Larry says. "We just got a call from Bill
Parks in the Eastern Region. He says he can't pay the insurance
premiums he owes us. (Read
more...)
2003:
Businesses today rely heavily on computers to cut costs, increase
transaction speed, create competitive advantages and store vital
information. This embrace of computer technology often means moving
to large systems and networks. Although these systems and networks
come with built-in controls, such as segregation of duties, they
can never replace honest management. In this case, a manager under
financial pressure used his influence over his employees to bypass
the system controls. He was able to embezzle money until one
employee courageously stood up to his questionable procedures. (Read
more...)
The Padding That Hurts
FEBRUARY 2003:
Davenport, an independent auditor, had a hot potato on his hands. He had
just learned from Robert, his client’s internal auditor, that an employee
had reported to him possible expense account abuses by one of the company’s
managers. Robert said that this employee accompanied Murphy, a senior
vice-president, on many business trips. The employee said Murphy had some
curious habits: When getting out of a taxi, he would ask for extra blank
receipts, and in restaurants, he would often do the same. (Read
more...)
2002
Keep Ghosts Off the Payroll
DECEMBER 2002: Turner, a payroll specialist for a large Florida nonprofit
organization, was a sick man. Most employees who steal do so out of greed,
but Turner had a different motive—he was HIV-positive and needed expensive
drugs to control the disease. Complicating matters, he hid his illness from
his employer and health insurer. Over the course of two years, he embezzled
$112,000 to cover his medical costs. Although Turner needed the extra cash,
there were alternatives to stealing. But he couldn’t bring himself to reveal
his sickness and ask for help. (Read
more...)
Billing
Schemes, Part 4:
Personal Purchases
OCTOBER 2002: This is the final instalment in a four-part series on identifying false
invoices and their issuers.
Most business
owners enjoy their leadership role. But wearing the boss’s hat means
shouldering diverse responsibilities, and many entrepreneurs don’t have time
to manage human resources and other important administrative functions. So
they often hire someone to do these jobs for them. If
at first all goes well, the boss may no longer check to see if his or her
managers follow proper supervisory procedures. That’s when trouble brews. (Read
more...)
Billing Schemes, Part 3:
Pay-and-Return
Invoicing
SEPTEMBER 2002: This is the third article in a four-part series
on identifying false invoices and their issuers.
A philosopher once said the road to hell is
paved with good intentions. As all fraud examiners know, given the right
circumstances—for example, a personal financial crisis coupled with weak
internal controls on the job—many otherwise law-abiding employees will
rationalize their way into stealing from the companies they work for. (Read
more...)
Billing Schemes, Part 2:
Pass-Throughs
AUGUST 2002: This is the second article in a four-part series on identifying false
invoices and their issuers.
Ben, a recent
accounting graduate, was on his first real auditing assignment at a West
Virginia manufacturer of prepackaged cement. Because Ben was a rookie, his
supervisors naturally assigned him tasks they didn’t want to perform. That
explains why he was standing atop one of the company’s
seven huge cement silos on the morning of December 31, his
teeth chattering in the cold wind as he observed employees taking inventory.
As workers sounded, or measured, each silo’s contents, Ben watched dutifully
and then double-checked every measurement they made. (Read
more...)
Billing Schemes, Part 1:
Shell Companies That Don’t
Deliver
JULY 2002: This is the first article in a four-part series on identifying false
invoices and their issuers.
As he left the
county clerk’s office, Stanley, a creative writer at a large advertising
firm, gazed at the paper he’d just obtained and smiled to himself. For $35,
it was easily the best investment he had ever made. Stanley pocketed the
document and drove straight to his bank. Less than 30 minutes
after presenting the paper to an official, he opened a
business account in the name of SRJ Enterprises—a title that reflected his
initials. The simple document—known as a fictitious-name or DBA (doing
business as) certificate—was the key to his grand plan to defraud his
employer. (Read
more...) |